After county housing authority terminated tenant’s housing assistance benefits, she appealed.
The Supreme Court held that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to review county housing authority’s decision to terminate tenant’s housing assistance benefits.
County housing authority was an agency of the state, but it was a public corporation and not a department or other administrative unit of the executive branch of state government, and thus the Administrative Agencies Practices Act (AAPA) did not provide for judicial review, and the housing authority was not operating the housing assistance program at the direction and supervision of a state executive agency.