Property owner sought review of decision of township zoning hearing board, rejecting substantive validity challenges to zoning ordinance and zoning map, as well as accompanying request for site-specific relief. The Court of Common Pleas, affirmed. Property owner appealed.
The Commonwealth Court held that:
- Property owner failed to establish improper reverse spot zoning;
- Ordinance limiting development to only one lot per 25 acres on any tract containing more than 10 acres was a proper use of police power to further agricultural property; and
- Property owner failed to establish denial of a fair hearing.