Residential property owners brought action to challenge municipal ordinance which limited to 30% the number of lots on a block eligible to obtain certification as a rental property. The District Court granted summary judgment for city, and property owners appealed.
The Court of Appeals held that:
- Ordinance was a valid exercise of police power;
- Ordinance was not unconstitutional on its face;
- Ordinance was not unconstitutional as applied;
- Ordinance did not violate any substantive due process right to rent property; and
- Ordinance did not improperly delegate legislative power.