Neighbors sought review of Zoning Commission’s approval of zoning map amendment and application for a planned unit development (PUD).
The Court of Appeals held that:
- Evidence was sufficient to support finding that additional height sought in zoning map amendment was essential to successful functioning of project;
- Fact that Commission improperly failed to make explicit finding about gross floor area, in determining whether PUD satisfied requirement that new residential building projects of a certain size reserve units for affordable housing, did not require reversal; and
- Commission’s failure to include in record a land disposition and development agreement did not violate neighbors’ due process rights.