City sought review of decision of the Liquor Control Board to grant spirits license to applicant and to allow applicant to relocate the license of a former state-run liquor store. The Superior Court dismissed petition for lack of standing. City appealed.
The Court of Appeals held that:
- City satisfied “zone of interest” requirement for standing;
- Trial court was to consider city’s supplemental declarations on the issue of standing;
- City satisfied “injury in fact” requirement for standing; and
- A court order reversing Board’s decision would remedy city’s alleged injury, thus supporting finding of standing.