Motorist brought action against city employee, who was driving city-owned vehicle covered by city’s liability insurance policy when he was struck by motorist’s vehicle. The trial court denied employee’s motion for summary judgment. Employee appealed.
The Court of Appeals held that:
- Motorist failed to demonstrate that employee violated city ordinance and county ordinance;
- Motorist failed to demonstrate that employee violated statute governing obedience to traffic-control devices; and
- Motorist failed to demonstrate that employee committed criminal trespass.