High Yield Municipal Bonds: Understanding Where Credit Risk Lives.

Even among nonrated bonds, defaults are generally rare and focused on narrow areas.

Moody’s regularly publishes a study that examines defaults in the rated universe of distressed municipal bonds, but it leaves out a sizable portion of the municipal market that is unrated. To provide clarity on the full municipal market, we conducted our own study using Bloomberg data. Here’s what we found.

With over $3.7 trillion municipal bonds currently outstanding, there are approximately $57 billion in municipal bonds (or 1.5% of the outstanding municipal market) in Bloomberg that are coded as distressed. Distressed in this instance can mean that the issuer fully defaulted on a bond payment, partially defaulted on a bond payment, or is in violation of a covenant (i.e., the debt service coverage ratio is below the set-forth amount).

As the table below indicates, the sector with the largest number of distressed bonds is Tobacco, with $14.2 billion or 23.5% of the total. Such bonds are funded with settlement money and categorized as distressed due to the overall decline in smoking and the fact that some large issuers have drawn on their liquidity reserve funds to pay interest. General Obligation (GO) bonds account for $13 billion or 21.6% of the total. This should not be taken as an indication of poor credit quality in GOs overall; it’s more that names that have received extensive headline coverage for fiscal concerns-Puerto Rico, Detroit and Jefferson County-all have bonds in the category. The Power sector, the third largest ($8.2 billion or 13.6%), is largely composed of Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) debt, which is subject to similar pressures as other municipal issuance from the commonwealth.

Sector Par Outstanding Number of Distressed Credits
Tobacco Settlement 14,240,689,199 40
General Obligation 13,061,406,880 375
Power 8,199,925,000 244
Other* 8,140,559,192 894
Development 4,509,884,983 543
Water 2,324,284,636 212
Pollution 1,427,215,000 46
Facilities 1,292,044,000 191
Nursing Homes 1,192,993,593 311
Medical 1,038,405,000 232
Multifamily Housing 1,000,142,118 195
Airport 830,615,000 19
Transportation 755,055,441 64
Build America Bonds 681,670,000 6
Education 445,625,000 79
Higher Education 350,010,000 53
Utilities 341,515,000 42
Mello-Roos 292,915,000 126
Housing 237,733,785 29
Single Family Housing 62,504,423 32
School District 7,880,000 10
Bond Bank 195,000 1
Total $60,433,268,251 3,744

*Other refers to Special Tax District, Bonds, Tax Increment Bonds and certain Community Development District bonds.
Source: Bloomberg, Neuberger Berman, data as of November 23, 2015.

By definition, high yield municipal bonds carry greater credit risk than their investment grade municipal counterparts. But it bears noting that distressed credits are less common among high yield municipals than their corporate high yield counterparts, where 2.3% of bonds are considered to be distressed. 1 As such, we believe that the municipal market continues to be a good place to add credit risk in exchange for additional yield, particularly among what we would characterize as quality non-investment grade issues. Of course, when investing in higher yield bonds, it is important that investors undertake careful analysis of issuer credit fundamentals as they pertain to long-term payment prospects.

1 As defined by the Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index.

This material is provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This material is not intended as a formal research report and should not be relied upon as a basis for making an investment decision. The firm, its employees and advisory clients may hold positions of companies within sectors discussed. Specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold or recommended for advisory clients. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities identified and described were or will be profitable. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Information presented may include estimates, outlooks, projections and other “forward looking statements.” Due to a variety of factors, actual events may differ significantly from those presented. Neuberger Berman products and services may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all client types. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Investments in hedge funds and private equity are speculative and involve a higher degree of risk than more traditional investments. Investments in hedge funds and private equity are intended for sophisticated investors only. Unless otherwise indicated returns shown reflect reinvestment of dividends and distributions. Indexes are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The views expressed herein may include those of those of Neuberger Berman’s Asset Allocation Committee which comprises professionals across multiple disciplines, including equity and fixed income strategists and portfolio managers. The Asset Allocation Committee reviews and sets long-term asset allocation models and establishes preferred near-term tactical asset class allocations. The views of the Asset Allocation Committee may not reflect the views of the firm as a whole and Neuberger Berman advisers and portfolio managers may recommend or take contrary positions to the views of the Asset Allocation Committee. The Asset Allocation Committee views do not constitute a prediction or projection of future events or future market behavior.

December 02, 2015, 12:00:00 AM EDT

By Sarah Gehring | Senior Research Analyst, Municipal Fixed Income, Neuberger Berman

This material is being issued on a limited basis through various global subsidiaries and affiliates of Neuberger Berman Group LLC. Please visit www.nb.com/disclosure-global-communications for the specific entities and jurisdictional limitations and restrictions.

The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC.

© 2009-2015 Neuberger Berman LLC. | All rights reserved

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.



Copyright © 2024 Bond Case Briefs | bondcasebriefs.com