GASB RFC: Financial Reporting Model Reexamination.

The GASB is working toward the issuance of an initial document for public comment in its project reexamining the financial reporting model. The Invitation to Comment will seek feedback from stakeholders on elements of the existing model that the GASB’s research identified as areas of potential improvement. This article previews what the Board is preparing for issuance at the end of 2016.

Unlike other due process documents, which contain proposals from the Board for new or amended standards, an Invitation to Comment is a neutral document that seeks stakeholder input on a variety of alternatives before the Board develops a position on them.

It is important to note that the feedback received during the initial pre-agenda research indicated that much of the financial reporting model has been effective in providing information that is useful for making decisions and assessing accountability. Therefore, the Board decided that the approach of the financial reporting model reexamination will be to make improvements to the existing model, rather than start over with a clean slate.

TARGETED AREAS OF POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENT

The Invitation to Comment is expected to present a number of targeted areas of potential improvement to governmental fund financial statements, including:

The Board plans to consider other areas identified for potential improvement during the research in future due process documents.

MAPPING OUT THE INVITATION TO COMMENT

Chapter One

The first chapter will make the case for why the Board is exploring recognition approaches for governmental funds—to improve the effectiveness of governmental fund information, develop conceptual consistency, and provide a basis for establishing guidance for complex transactions.

Chapter Two

This chapter will introduce three alternatives that fall on a continuum for recognition approaches for governmental fund financial statements:

For each of these three recognition approaches, the document will describe:

Stakeholder input will give the Board additional insight as to which recognition approach yields the most understandable and useful information about the governmental funds.

Chapter Three

This portion of the document will consider a statement of cash flows for governmental funds for the short-term (working capital) financial resources and long-term (total) financial resources recognition approaches.

A cash flows statement presents a government’s receipts and disbursements into different categories—operating activities, noncapital activities, capital and related financing activities, and investing activities—based on the nature of the transaction. Currently, cash flows statements are required in the proprietary funds (funds reporting activities for which a government generally charges a fee for goods or services).

This document will seek input on whether there would be a need for a cash flows statement if the governmental funds were to use either of the recognition approaches other than near-term financial resources. It also would consider which cash flows categories are most relevant.

The chapter also will consider two presentation format alternatives for the resource flows statement for governmental funds:

Input on these very different formats will assist the Board in evaluating which provides financial statement users with the most understandable and useful information.

We welcome your input once the Invitation to Comment has been issued in December 2016.



Copyright © 2024 Bond Case Briefs | bondcasebriefs.com