Fitch Rtgs: Growing US Infrastructure Deficit Necessitates a New Paradigm

Fitch Ratings-New York-14 February 2020: Any government plan for renewing and advancing essential US infrastructure requires a new paradigm to adequately address the infrastructure funding deficit, says Fitch Ratings. While a source of adequate and sustainable funding is a critical component, a results-oriented, objective and strategic approach to investment, along with responsible stewardship of the public purse, are paramount. Increased spending without a strategic, comprehensive approach to infrastructure investment based on national priorities will not go far in addressing the continued deterioration of critical economic assets.

Passage of a large-scale federal infrastructure spending bill stalled in 2019 due to a lack of consensus on a funding approach, despite bipartisan recognition of the need to address the country’s aging infrastructure. Political disagreements partially reflect difficult budget decisions, which will need to be made in the context of a federal deficit that is projected to reach $1.0 trillion this fiscal year. Trying to tackle the issue in a presidential election year will be next to impossible.

Addressing US infrastructure needs will require a significant uptick in annual new investment. Prior government proposals have been rather tepid, suggesting up to $200 billion in new investment a year. While a good start, it is a drop in the bucket, as a multi-trillion dollar infrastructure deficit will require a glide-path to trillion dollar annual investments at 5% of US GDP and more than double recent historical levels to have a meaningful impact. Direct federal spending on nondefense infrastructure, as a percentage of GDP, declined marginally over the past two years and was less than 0.1% of GDP in 2018.

Investments in infrastructure have historically led to increased economic activity and growth. The risk of putting off investment is obvious: infrastructure assets, which are essential to the US economy, will continue to deteriorate, requiring even greater financial resources down the line and making the problem even more difficult to address. Slowing GDP growth will compound this risk, making increased investment less feasible. The irony is that the ability to invest is strongest when the economy is robust.

Such a large-scale undertaking requires a coordinated effort across multiple stakeholders and levels of government to prioritize and fund national needs and provide long-term support for infrastructure renewal. An independent, non-partisan infrastructure commission with the teeth to influence funding and spending may be a useful model to facilitate sustained planning and investment.

With no federal plan currently in place, states and local governments have made efforts to fill the funding gap, including raising gas taxes, using toll revenues for other unrelated projects, or entering into public-private partnerships. State and local spending on infrastructure was about 1.5% of GDP in 2018 but infrastructure needs are too great to address on their own. States and municipalities need funding visibility and assistance to begin work on necessary projects.

Costs associated with repairing and protecting infrastructure will only grow if the funding gap is not addressed systematically. The deficit could be exacerbated with the potential threats to infrastructure from environmental risks such as rising sea levels. Upfront investments to build resiliency would cost less than rebuilding following weather-related events.

Contact:

Cherian George
Managing Director, Global Head, Global Infrastructure and Project Finance
+1 212 908-0519
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
Hearst Tower
300 W. 57th Street
New York, NY 10019

Sarah Repucci
Senior Director, Fitch Wire
+1 212 908-0726

Media Relations: Sandro Scenga, New York, Tel: +1 212 908 0278, Email: [email protected]

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com. The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings.



Copyright © 2024 Bond Case Briefs | bondcasebriefs.com