Election organization petitioned for writs of mandamus against Secretary of State, Ballot Board, and Attorney General, after its initiative petition was split into four separate proposals.
The Supreme Court held that:
- Organization was entitled to writ of mandamus directing Ballot Board to certify proposed constitutional amendment as written;
- Organization was entitled to writ of mandamus directing Secretary of State to convene meeting of Ballot Board;
- Organization was not entitled to writ of mandamus directing Attorney General to certify proposed amendment; and
- Organization was not entitled to extension of time in which to collect signatures.