Plaintiff brought action alleging that city’s technical review group (TRG) was public body for purposes of Right-to-Know Law.
After bench trial, the Superior Court entered judgment in city’s favor, and plaintiff appealed.
The Supreme Court held that:
- TRG was not “advisory committee” subject to Right-to-Know Law’s open meeting requirement, and
- Trial court’s determination that city’s copy fee schedule was commensurate with “actual cost” of producing photocopies was reasonable.