Property owners and land developer brought action against county board of elections, seeking writs of prohibition and mandamus ordering board to remove zoning referendum from upcoming election ballot.
The Supreme Court held that:
- Relators lacked adequate remedy in ordinary course of the law;
- Board did not disregard requirement that referendum petition be accompanied by affected area;
- Referendum petition’s summary was not rendered inadequate for including only first page of zoning application;
- Referendum petition’s summary was not rendered inadequate by quality of attached maps; and
- Referendum petition’s summary was not rendered inadequate for referring signers to zoning-commission office for additional information.