Taxpayers petitioned for relief from city’s tax assessments of their dwelling units in residential condominium development following a revaluation of units upon expiration of tax stabilization agreement for development.
After a bench trial, the Superior Court entered judgments for taxpayers. Tax assessor appealed.
The Supreme Court held that revaluation was not a selective assessment.
City’s revaluation of taxpayer’s dwelling units in residential condominium development upon expiration of tax stabilization agreement for development was not a selective assessment, where city’s normal practice was to revalue and reassess properties upon expiration of a tax stabilization agreement, and there was no evidence that similar properties in city were not subjected to revaluation.