Owner and operator of liquor store sought judicial review of city’s revocation of its alcoholic beverage permit.
Following a de novo trial, the District Court affirmed revocation of the permit. Owner and operator of liquor store appealed.
The Court of Appeal held that:
- Notice of city council meeting to consider rescinding alcoholic beverage permit was sufficient to put permit holder on notice as to allegations against it and to prepare its defense thereto;
- Sufficient evidence supported revocation of permit; and
- Any potential error in allowing city council transcript into record had no substantial effect on outcome of case.