TAX - MARYLAND

Comptroller of Maryland v. Comcast of California

Supreme Court of Maryland - July 12, 2023 - A.3d - 2023 WL 4482556

Communications companies, as taxpayers, sought declaratory judgment that digital advertising tax violated Commerce Clause and First Amendment, as well as Internet Tax Freedom Act.

The Circuit Court granted declaratory judgment for companies. Comptroller appealed. Certiorari was granted before decision in Appellate Court.

The Supreme Court held that:

Special statutory administrative remedies were exclusive with respect to challenge to digital advertising gross revenues tax, since Tax-General Article generally prohibited judicial remedies that would prevent assessment or collection of taxes and Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article specifically prohibited use of declaratory judgment action as end-run around special statutory administrative remedies.

Tax-General Article broadly prohibiting judicial action that would interfere with the assessment or collection of taxes and the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article prohibiting the use of declaratory judgment actions as an end-run around special statutory administrative remedies establish a legislative intent that the special statutory administrative remedies provided for the resolution of tax disputes are exclusive.

Declaratory judgment declaring digital advertising gross revenues tax unlawful violated Tax-General Article generally prohibiting judicial remedies that would prevent assessment or collection of taxes, since only reason for declaratory judgment was expectation that it would prevent Comptroller from assessing or collecting that tax.

Constitutional exception to administrative exhaustion requirement was not applicable to dispute over digital advertising gross revenues tax, since applicable special statutory administrative remedies were exclusive with respect to challenge to that tax.

Constitutional exception to administrative exhaustion requirement was not applicable to dispute over digital advertising gross revenues tax, since applicable special statutory administrative remedies were exclusive with respect to challenge to that tax.

Taxpayers disputing digital advertising gross revenues tax were required to exhaust their administrative remedies, and therefore trial court did not have jurisdiction to entertain their declaratory judgment action, since Tax-General Article provided special statutory administrative remedies for taxpayers to pursue their challenge.



Copyright © 2024 Bond Case Briefs | bondcasebriefs.com