TAX - MINNESOTA

Huizenga v. Independent School District No. 11

United States District Court, D. Minnesota - March 29, 2024 - F.Supp.3d - 2024 WL 1345173

Taxpayers brought § 1983 action against school district and teachers union, alleging that political advocacy by teachers while on paid leave, under provision of collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) allowing paid leave for the conduct of union business, violated taxpayer’s free-speech rights under the First Amendment and the Minnesota Constitution and violated the Minnesota Public Employee Labor Relations Act.

The District Court dismissed taxpayers’ federal claims for lack of Article III standing and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims. On taxpayers’ appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit vacated and remanded, holding that taxpayers had sufficiently alleged municipal taxpayer standing as school-district taxpayers. On remand, after discovery, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment.

The District Court held that:



Copyright © 2025 Bond Case Briefs | bondcasebriefs.com