County filed petition in error for review of decision of board of commissioners of adjoining county denying county’s claim under county bridge statutes for reimbursement for one-half of cost of replacing bridge.
The District Court denied and dismissed petition. County appealed.
The Supreme Court held that:
- Broad legal conclusion in petition in error was insufficient to raise claims about due process and board’s closed session, and
- Board’s determination that bridge was not located on road on county line was not arbitrary and capricious.