IRS Releases Complete Revision of IRM 3.12.26, Tax Exempt Bond Error Resolution Procedures
FINRA Sanctions Firm for Custody and Transaction Confirmation Deficiencies: Norton Rose Fulbright
Vianello v. City of Prairie Village, Kansas – US District Court holds that individual lacked standing to challenge city’s issuance of general obligation bonds, noting that Federal court is not an appropriate forum for municipal taxpayers to challenge whether their municipality properly followed state law.
Delaware’s Supreme Court Affirms Decision Denying New Castle County Property Owners’ Challenge to Split-Rate 2025-26 Residential and Non-Residential Property Taxes: Richards, Layton & Finger
And Finally, Double Trouble is brought to us this week by Philip v. Pollock, in which the court weighed evidence regarding a dog’s known, “vicious propensity” (Can we make this the name of the world’s first Public Finance Punk Band? Please?) following an attack. Didn’t help that the dog’s owner had advertised it – Double Cross – in a social media post as, “weaponized.” When asked at his deposition whether American Bullies like Double Cross will chase and pull on objects, the owner testified that, “That’s what a dog do. They … bite. That’s the only form of … stuff they do. They bite. They bite at anything.” Well spoken, sir. You are clearly the type of gentleman who has carefully thought through all of the hilariously ironic possibilities entailed in owning a very bitey dog called, Double Cross.

Bond Case Briefs