- Ed. Note: We occasionally receive requests to resend past issues of the newsletter. Unfortunately, the newsletter does not exist as a discrete document, and is merely a program that pulls together the HTMLs for each item posted to our website during the previous week. We can resend the latest issue. Otherwise, please access past content by going directly to bondcasebriefs.com where you can select a topic (e.g. Tax) and scroll down through the entries, which are posted in chronologic order. The website also contains a search function that will allow you to access older content. We’d apologize for any inconvenience, but you know us better than that.
- Frequently Asked Questions on FINRA’s Eligibility Proceedings for Firms Participating in the MCDC
- Initiative.New Player Seeks to Revive VRDO Market.
- Putting the Public Back in Public Finance.
- CDFA Fundamentals of Economic Development Finance Course.
- GAI Consultants, Inc. v. Homestead Borough – Appeals court holds that TIF Agreement is an ongoing contract, and therefore claims for reimbursement of property tax assessment appeal refunds are not subject to the four-year statute of limitations for contract actions.
- Indian River County v. Rogoff – District Court holds that counties lacked standing to request a preliminary injunction vacating the U.S. DOT’s authorization of PABs to construct a rail line traversing the counties; issuance of the PABs would not redress the counties’ alleged environmental injuries, as the developer was prepared to proceed using alternate sources of financing.
- And finally, we do our best to cover each and every inverse condemnation case that comes our way. That being said, should you wish to ensure that your case makes the cut, please be sure that the opinion begins, “In 2011, the City of St. Petersburg demolished Christine Lacy’s house after it was damaged in a shoot-out between St. Petersburg police and Lacy’s husband. Yeah, we’re gonna go ahead and publish that.
